At US Supreme Court, clashing views presented on presidential immunity
Drudge Report -

During arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court on Donald Trump's claim of presidential immunity from prosecution, two starkly different views of the consequences were on display on Thursday. Trump's lawyer, D. John Sauer, painted a dire picture of presidents facing "de facto blackmail and extortion by his political rivals while he is still in office" because of the threat of future prosecution without the immunity the former president is seeking. Michael Dreeben, arguing on behalf of Special...

Related Articles

Latest in News

More from Drudge Report | Donald Trump D. John Sauer U.S. Supreme Court Michael Dreeben presidential immunity absolute immunity Special Counsel Jack Smith prosecution President Joe Biden Ketanji Brown Jackson presidents