There is no Eighth Amendment right to vagrancy
Washington Examiner -

Oral argument before the Supreme Court this week showed why it is nonsense to claim that anti-vagrancy laws violate the Constitution‘s Eighth Amendment provision against “cruel and unusual punishment.” Indeed, in the vernacular sense, what is cruel and unusual is a judicial edict that says law-abiding citizens must put up with public spaces featuring major […]

Related Articles

Latest in News

More from Washington Examiner | Editorials Opinion Constitution Homelessness Oregon Supreme Court